% Deref coercions
The standard library provides a special trait, [Deref]deref. It’s normally
used to overload *, the dereference operator:
use std::ops::Deref;
struct DerefExample<T> {
value: T,
}
impl<T> Deref for DerefExample<T> {
type Target = T;
fn deref(&self) -> &T {
&self.value
}
}
fn main() {
let x = DerefExample { value: 'a' };
assert_eq!('a', *x);
}
This is useful for writing custom pointer types. However, there’s a language
feature related to Deref: ‘deref coercions’. Here’s the rule: If you have a
type U, and it implements Deref<Target=T>, values of &U will
automatically coerce to a &T. Here’s an example:
fn foo(s: &str) {
// borrow a string for a second
}
// String implements Deref<Target=str>
let owned = "Hello".to_string();
// therefore, this works:
foo(&owned);
Using an ampersand in front of a value takes a reference to it. So owned is a
String, &owned is an &String, and since impl Deref<Target=str> for String, &String will deref to &str, which foo() takes.
That’s it. This rule is one of the only places in which Rust does an automatic
conversion for you, but it adds a lot of flexibility. For example, the Rc<T>
type implements Deref<Target=T>, so this works:
use std::rc::Rc;
fn foo(s: &str) {
// borrow a string for a second
}
// String implements Deref<Target=str>
let owned = "Hello".to_string();
let counted = Rc::new(owned);
// therefore, this works:
foo(&counted);
All we’ve done is wrap our String in an Rc<T>. But we can now pass the
Rc<String> around anywhere we’d have a String. The signature of foo
didn’t change, but works just as well with either type. This example has two
conversions: Rc<String> to String and then String to &str. Rust will do
this as many times as possible until the types match.
Another very common implementation provided by the standard library is:
fn foo(s: &[i32]) {
// borrow a slice for a second
}
// Vec<T> implements Deref<Target=[T]>
let owned = vec![1, 2, 3];
foo(&owned);
Vectors can Deref to a slice.
Deref and method calls
Deref will also kick in when calling a method. Consider the following
example.
struct Foo;
impl Foo {
fn foo(&self) { println!("Foo"); }
}
let f = &&Foo;
f.foo();
Even though f is a &&Foo and foo takes &self, this works. That’s
because these things are the same:
f.foo();
(&f).foo();
(&&f).foo();
(&&&&&&&&f).foo();
A value of type &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&Foo can still have methods defined on Foo
called, because the compiler will insert as many * operations as necessary to
get it right. And since it’s inserting *s, that uses Deref.
commit 024aa9a